WHAT IS BETTER MW3 OR BLACK OPS

WHAT IS BETTER MW3 OR BLACK OPS


  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .

xxThanatosx89

New member
Oh this is a tuff one it's like someone asking you if you would like to be stabbed in the right leg or the left leg both are **** options there are games on Nintendo 64 that have more quality and originality than both those games combined

As far as multiplayer black ops would have an advantage
Exmpl in game it lets you know who is in a party wich was usefull while mw3 just showed that they had the capability to speak but did not let in on their current status being as it only showed the mic icon

Mw3 was a game that they released to make money it is basically mw2 it has almost the same look
The campaign was iffy at best taking approximately 2-3 hours to complete
Mw3 is also not a team based game regardless of game type it's strictly a lone wolf game full of try hard 13-yr olds

While there is much better games out there (battlefield, mass, effect, gears of war, and halo) just to name a few between black ops and mw3 black ops was an all around better game.
As far as blops 2 I'd save my money for a real game it's better than seeing cod run out of wars so they decide to do one on the future come on and that's the best they got. They could drop it and start something new seeing as all there games are just copies of the last one
 

DumbBigWhiteGuy

New member
Feelings are mixed. MW3 campaign is too easy. I am by no means an above average FPS player and it didn't even frustrate me. I seem to do much better in MP on MW3 (no attack dogs or explosive RC cars to deal with). I like the missions and survival mode in MW3, good way to practice your game, but combat training in blops was alright too, probably more realistic gameplay wise. It does seem that the franchise has kind of run out of options going into Black Ops 2, will have to wait and see what it's like. Regardless it's bound to be a best-seller.
 

KoG YurMoM

New member
I like the campaign and zombies and everything else on Black Ops, but when it comes to multiplayer and the guns they juts seemed too fake for me and the snipers were as well not so good. By graphics i have to say mw3 wins, campaign wise its gonna have to be black ops but everything else is really mw3
 

ii Am Dv Jaeger

New member
There are pros and cons to each game. As I primarily play MW3, I would biasly say that I like MW3, but there were cool things in Black Ops that I wish they made more universal throughout all of the CoD games. I loved playing Zombies in Black Ops and was hoping that MW3 would contain the similar 4 player experience, just not zombies. Unfortunately that wasn't the case. It was fun with 2 players, but when you have to choose one friend to play it, while the others just go play Multiplayer.

I mean we really play these games for the social interaction with other people, whether that is to have a good time with friends, or to put "I think I am better that everyone" gamers in there place. Both actions generally end up being the case.

Dv
 

Reserved

New member
Yeah the mw3 campaign was to easy but I love the multiplayer black ops was good too hut no comparison to mw3
 

XGC Dragon Skin

New member
I agree with you Zero. MW3 multiplayer is the bomb and that is why Black Ops II was revamped to match. Plus I will have the best thing going for black ops which are the zombies. I just am a winner when I walk through that door to purchase the upcoming game.
 
Top